LT 4dr SUV (1.4L 4cyl Turbo 6A)
LT 4dr SUV AWD (1.4L 4cyl Turbo 6A)
LT 4dr SUV AWD (1.4L 4cyl Turbo 6A)
LT 4dr SUV AWD (1.4L 4cyl Turbo 6A)
LT 4dr SUV (1.4L 4cyl Turbo 6A)
LT 4dr SUV (1.4L 4cyl Turbo 6A)
LT 4dr SUV AWD (1.4L 4cyl Turbo 6A)
LT 4dr SUV AWD (1.4L 4cyl Turbo 6A)
LT 4dr SUV AWD (1.4L 4cyl Turbo 6A)
LT 4dr SUV AWD (1.4L 4cyl Turbo 6A)
LT 4dr SUV AWD (1.4L 4cyl Turbo 6A)
LT 4dr SUV AWD (1.4L 4cyl Turbo 6A)
LT 4dr SUV (1.4L 4cyl Turbo 6A)
LT 4dr SUV (1.4L 4cyl Turbo 6A)
Don’t want to go far?
Find all cars near me?LT 4dr SUV AWD (1.4L 4cyl Turbo 6A)
LT 4dr SUV AWD (1.4L 4cyl Turbo 6A)
LT 4dr SUV (1.4L 4cyl Turbo 6A)
LT 4dr SUV AWD (1.4L 4cyl Turbo 6A)
LT 4dr SUV AWD (1.4L 4cyl Turbo 6A)
LT 4dr SUV AWD (1.4L 4cyl Turbo 6A)
LT 4dr SUV AWD (1.4L 4cyl Turbo 6A)
LT 4dr SUV (1.4L 4cyl Turbo 6A)
LT 4dr SUV AWD (1.4L 4cyl Turbo 6A)
LT 4dr SUV (1.4L 4cyl Turbo 6A)
Overall Rating
Come the year 2020, the Chevrolet Trax still manages to somehow survive the cut-throat rivalry that characterizes this segment. The Chevrolet Trax reaches the pedestals in 3 trims - LS, LT, and Premier, with prices starting from $22,295.
When the Chevrolet Trax first came into being in the year 2015, it was an entrant of an innovative market fragment, that had just begin to take shape- the compact crossover segment. Trax seemed like a promising set of wheels for the American-bowtie, however, the scenario changed as the competition in this segment rose with a number of new entrants joining the crossover bandwagon.
Â
We recommend you to go for the LT trim, as the base LS does no favors to the ride. Whereas, on the other hand, upgrading to the LT trim lends your ride with side roof rails and a brighter and better interior trim, along with several other additional features.
LT 4dr SUV AWD (1.4L 4cyl Turbo 6A)
LT 4dr SUV AWD (1.4L 4cyl Turbo 6A)
LT 4dr SUV AWD (1.4L 4cyl Turbo 6A)
LT 4dr SUV AWD (1.4L 4cyl Turbo 6A)
LT 4dr SUV AWD (1.4L 4cyl Turbo 6A)
LT 4dr SUV AWD (1.4L 4cyl Turbo 6A)
Come the year 2020, the Chevrolet Trax still manages to somehow survive the cut-throat rivalry that characterizes this segment. The Chevrolet Trax reaches the pedestals in 3 trims - LS, LT, and Premier, with prices starting from $22,295.
When the Chevrolet Trax first came into being in the year 2015, it was an entrant of an innovative market fragment, that had just begin to take shape- the compact crossover segment. Trax seemed like a promising set of wheels for the American-bowtie, however, the scenario changed as the competition in this segment rose with a number of new entrants joining the crossover bandwagon.
Â
The Chevrolet Trax is on offer in 3 trims, LS, LT, and Premier. The prices for the Trax start from $22,295 for the LS trim, in its FWD configuration. There is absolutely no mechanical difference between the trims. The only differences that come into being are in the form of exterior tweaks or interior updates.
Trims |
LS |
LT |
Premier |
---|---|---|---|
MSRP (FWD) |
$22,295 |
$24,195 |
$28,595 |
MSRP (AWD) |
$23,795 |
$25,695 |
$30,095 |
Key Features |
Rear vision camera |
Adds to/replaces LS features: |
Adds to/replaces LT features: |
|
Daytime running lights |
LED taillamps |
Fog lamps |
|
16-inch painted steel wheels |
16-inch aluminum wheels |
18-inch aluminum wheels |
|
Body-color power outside mirrors
|
Body-color liftgate appliqué |
Body-color heated power outside mirrors |
|
Cloth seat trim |
Deluxe cloth seat trim |
Leatherette seat trim |
We recommend
We recommend you to go for the LT trim, as the base LS does no favors to the ride. Whereas, on the other hand, upgrading to the LT trim lends your ride with side roof rails and a brighter and better interior trim, along with several other additional features.
The Chevrolet Trax obtains power via a 1.4L inline-4 engine. This powerhouse, though, is turbocharged, but definitely does not feel like one. The engine churns out 138 hp along with 148 lb.-ft. Of torque, which feels meek, even when seen with the segment standards.
The 1.4L engine is further mated to a 6-speed automatic transmission that routes the power to the front or all wheels, depending upon your choice of drivetrain. The transmission, though, is agreeably smooth but often feels sluggish when it comes to shifting the gears. The transmission’s hesitation to downshift is well-noticeable as well.
Models |
Chevrolet Trax |
Toyota C-HR |
Honda HR-V |
Hyundai Kona |
---|---|---|---|---|
MSRP |
$22,295 |
$21,295 |
$20,820 |
$20,100 |
Engine |
1.4L Inline-4 | 2.0L Inline-4 | 1.8L Inline-4 | 2.0L Inline-4 |
Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | FWD | FWD |
Transmission |
6-Speed Automatic with Auto-Manual |
CVT with Intelligence and Shift Mode |
CVT with Overdrive and Manual Mode |
CVT with Manual Mode |
Power |
138hp@4,900rpm | 144hp@6,100rpm | 141hp@6,500rpm | 147hp@6,200rpm |
Torque |
148lb-ft@1,850rpm | 139lbft@3,900rpm | 127lbft@4,300rpm | 132lbft@4,500rpm |
The Toyota C-HR and the Hyundai Kona lead the power figure comparison with 147 and 144 horses being tucked underneath their hood respectively. The Honda HR-V isn’t too far behind as well, as the 1.8L I4 engine of the ride can fabricate a decent 141 hp along with 127 lb.-ft. Of torque.
Acceleration is definitely no forte for the crossovers of this segment. Not even a single offering of this segment posts off the mark figures which can be referred to as impressive or even respectable.
The Chevrolet Trax strolls from 0-60 in 9.3 seconds and can cover the quarter of a mile distance in 16.8 seconds. The power delivery feels absolutely flat and bland, without even the slightest of the punch.
Model |
Chevrolet Trax |
Toyota C-HR |
Honda HR-V |
Hyundai Kona |
---|---|---|---|---|
0-60 MPH |
9.3 sec |
11.0 sec |
9.3 sec |
10.0 sec |
Quarter Mile |
16.8 sec |
18.4 sec |
16.8 sec |
17.3 sec |
Top Speed | N/A | N/A | 125 MPH | 130 MPH |
Engine |
1.4L Inline-4 | 2.0L Inline-4 | 1.8L Inline-4 | 2.0L Inline-4 |
As we mentioned earlier, crossovers of this segment, are just not made to go fast. The Trax and the HR-V, however, are the least bad contenders, going from 0-60 in 9.3 seconds, as compared to the 11 and 10 second 0-60 figures of the C-HR and the Kona respectively. The Trax has the maximum amount of torque, which kicks in at 1800 rpm, thus lending this car an edge over other contenders.
The Chevrolet Trax offers two braking configurations, depending upon the trim. The base LS trim finds itself fitted with 4-wheel antilock front disc/ rear drum brakes, whereas, the LT and the Premier trim houses a 4-wheel antilock disc brakes arrangement.
The pedal feels firm and is quite easy to modulate around the city. The rear-disc brakes with front-drum decelerate the 2800 pound heavy crossover with ease. However, the exact 60-0 figures are not yet available for the 2020 Chevrolet Trax.
Model |
Chevrolet Trax |
Toyota C-HR |
Honda HR-V |
Hyundai Kona |
---|---|---|---|---|
Brake Rotors Front |
11.8" |
11.8" |
11.5" |
11.8" |
Brake Rotors Rear |
9.0" |
11.1" |
11.1" |
9.0" (Drum) |
Curb Weight |
2805 lbs |
3300 lbs |
2906 lbs |
2890 lbs |
60-0 MPH |
N/A |
N/A |
125 ft |
129 ft |
The Chevrolet Trax provides a decent driving experience but its not the engine that plays any part in this development and neither the transmission. The transmission, in fact, feels very sluggish and laggy which degrades the quotient for the Trax.
The main USP of the Chevrolet Trax is its steering wheel. The steering of the Trax is light and quick and provides the driver with nimble handling and responsive feedback. The Trax feels slow, and lacks power especially when trying to merge onto the freeways.
The Chevrolet Trax does fine in this department. Owing to its small footprint and relatively low weight, the Trax gives out a decent mpg score. The Trax with the FWD configuration can churn out a city mpg of 26, and a highway mpg of 31. Summing up these figures, we get a combined mpg figure of 28.
Employing the AWD configuration to the ride drops the figures by a nick, giving out 24 city, 29 highway, and 26 combined mpg.
Model |
Chevrolet Trax |
Toyota C-HR |
Honda HR-V |
Hyundai Kona |
---|---|---|---|---|
MPG (City) |
26 |
27 |
28 |
27 |
MPG (Highway) |
31 |
31 |
34 |
33 |
MPG (Combined) |
28 |
29 |
30 |
30 |
Fuel Capacity |
14.0 gallons |
13.2 gallons |
13.2 gallons |
13.2 gallons |
Range (City/Hwy/Combined) |
364/434/392 miles |
356/409/382 miles |
370/449/396 miles |
356/436/390 miles |
Emission (Tons/yr of CO2 Emissions @ 15K mi/yr) |
N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
The Chevrolet Trax’s fuel economy numbers seem strong when considered in solidarity, however, the moment you place it against the competition, the same numbers start looking frail. The HR-V and the Kona offer the best in class combined mpg figure of 30, followed up by the C-HR and finally the Trax. The Trax, however, gets the most cavernous fuel tank in the segment.
The insides of the Trax are more of a mixed bag. While on one hand, some of the materials and details exude elegance, on the other end, some elements spoil the game for this compact crossover. Details such as the stitched dashboard inserts lend the ride an upscale look, while the cheap quality plastic inserts near the shifter do the downgrading tasks.
There is no option of automatic climate control in the Trax and only the Premier trim comes equipped with resources such as heated front seats, and a sunroof. The front seats feel firm, and four-way power adjustment is a standard feature for the driver’s seat on the LS and the LT trims, while the Premier trim commences it to 6-way power-adjustable.
Model |
Chevrolet Trax |
Toyota C-HR |
Honda HR-V |
Hyundai Kona |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seating Capacity |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
Front Row (Head/Shoulder/Leg) (in) |
39.6/54.1/40.8 |
38.1/49.0/43.5 |
39.5/56.8/41.2 |
39.6/55.5/41.5 |
Rear Row (Head/Shoulder/Leg) (in) |
38.8/52.8/35.7 |
38.3/52.5/31.7 |
38.3/54.5/39.3 |
37.8/54.5/34.6 |
The Trax offers a high seating position, along with a load of headroom, accrediting to the rising roofline. The cabin of the Trax looks roomy and airy, but in reality, it has lesser rear passenger space than some of its competitors.
The Chevrolet Trax houses a 7.0-inch focal touchscreen panel that takes care of all its infotainment needs. The arrangement is basic, yet effective, giving rapid reactions to your actions and loaded with several smart features. Some of the most prominent infotainment features of the Chevrolet Trax are:
The compact crossover from the house of Chevrolet offers a fair number of convenience features that can make the occupants feel at ease while on-board the Chevrolet Trax. Though there is also an absence of some basic features like automatic climate control or cruise control. Some of the most prominent comfort features that the Trax houses are:
The Chevrolet Trax is a high-riding compact crossover, that offers 18.7 cubic feet of space. Drop the second-row seats and you end up with 48.4 cubic feet of cargo space, which can accommodate plenty of luggage for you.
Considering the space, you can fit in up to 18 carry-on suitcases in the trunk, which is a decent number.
Model |
Chevrolet Trax |
Toyota C-HR |
Honda HR-V |
Hyundai Kona |
---|---|---|---|---|
Cargo Capacity |
18.7 cu.ft. |
19.1 cu.ft. |
24.3 cu.ft. |
19.2 cu.ft. |
The Chevrolet Trax presents you with a generous amount of space behind its trunk hood, but other contenders of the segment do so much better than what this Chevy offers. The HR-V is the pick of the litter if you often find yourself carrying hefty luggage. The Kona and the C-HR offer similar cargo space with both the rides offering 19.2 and 19.1 cubic feet of space.
The Chevrolet Trax does impose a strong, mild, or any kind of presence on the streets. It’s just another car, that goes mostly unnoticed when waiting on a traffic signal or stationed at a parking lot.
The base trim of the Trax is actually basic, rolling upon steel wheels with plain wheel caps and unpainted bumpers. The upper trims, though make an attempt to somewhat enhance the look for the Trax by adding roof-mounted side rails and bigger alloy wheels, but the Trax does not really seem to get anywhere near the appealing track.
Model |
Chevrolet Trax |
Toyota C-HR |
Honda HR-V |
Hyundai Kona |
---|---|---|---|---|
Curb Weight |
3124 lbs |
3300 lbs |
2906 lbs |
2890 lbs |
Length |
167.6" |
172.6" |
170.4" |
164.0" |
Width |
69.9" |
70.7" |
69.8" |
70.9" |
Height |
64.9" |
61.6" |
63.2" |
61.0" |
Ground Clearance |
6.2" |
5.9" |
7.3" |
6.7" |
Wheelbase |
100.6" |
103.9" |
102.8" |
102.4" |
The design philosophy of the Chevrolet Trax is very simple to understand – not overdone but simply curved and molded with a dash of – ‘this will do’ – mindset. A rear lip spoiler rests above the windowpane, while the same hard plastic design found in the front is twinned in the back.
The Chevrolet Trax is an average looking car from the house of Chevy which plays the role of a layman family transporter. The Trax does not really have any astounding charm in its design rather it carries a basic character. Some of the exterior features of the Chevrolet Trax are:
Chevrolet offers features such as rearview camera and stability control as standard safety highlights on the Trax, however, it lacks automatic emergency braking feature which is not offered in any of its trims. Some other prominent safety features of the Chevrolet Trax are:
The Chevrolet Trax and the Toyota C-HR are two faces of the same game. The only difference being, that on one hand where the Trax dons an old and boring character, the C-HR, on the other hand, carries a more urban appeal with it. Other than this one aspect, both the rides perform similarly, without much of a difference on any of the fronts.
The Honda HR-V is one of the most reasonable offerings of this compact crossover segment, with prices starting from $20,820. The HR-V houses a 1.8 Liter Inline-4 engine, which just like the Trax’s powerhouse feels noisy and unrefined. However, the HR-V is the top pick of the litter if utility is what you expect from your ride.
The Chevrolet Trax was one of the first vehicles that rose to the concept of “compact crossovers”. However, the Trax is more of a veteran now, as evident from the boring and bland design and character it dons and the ride quality it offers. There are a lot of better options to go for, which can offer a better ride, classy interiors, and a much appealing body design.