Platinum 4dr SUV 4WD (5.6L 8cyl 5A)
Platinum 4dr SUV 4WD (5.6L 8cyl 5A)
Platinum 4dr SUV 4WD (5.6L 8cyl 5A)
Platinum 4dr SUV 4WD (5.6L 8cyl 5A)
SL 4dr SUV (5.6L 8cyl 5A)
SV 4dr SUV (5.6L 8cyl 5A)
Platinum 4dr SUV (5.6L 8cyl 5A)
SV 4dr SUV 4WD (5.6L 8cyl 5A)
SV 4dr SUV (5.6L 8cyl 317 hp FFV 5A)
Platinum 4dr SUV 4WD (5.6L 8cyl 5A)
Platinum 4dr SUV (5.6L 8cyl 5A)
SL 4dr SUV (5.6L 8cyl 5A)
Platinum 4dr SUV 4WD (5.6L 8cyl 5A)
Platinum 4dr SUV 4WD (5.6L 8cyl 5A)
Don’t want to go far?
Find all cars near me?Platinum 4dr SUV (5.6L 8cyl 5A)
Platinum 4dr SUV 4WD (5.6L 8cyl 5A)
Platinum 4dr SUV 4WD (5.6L 8cyl 5A)
SV 4dr SUV (5.6L 8cyl 5A)
Platinum 4dr SUV (5.6L 8cyl 5A)
Platinum 4dr SUV 4WD (5.6L 8cyl 5A)
Platinum 4dr SUV (5.6L 8cyl 5A)
SV 4dr SUV (5.6L 8cyl 5A)
SL 4dr SUV 4WD (5.6L 8cyl 5A)
Platinum 4dr SUV 4WD (5.6L 8cyl 5A)
Overall Rating
Boxy SUVs have become a larger trend and garnered abundant attention, for they have higher space on the inside and score highly on the practicality front.
Boxy SUVs have become a larger trend and garnered abundant attention, for they have higher space on the inside and score highly on the practicality front. The Nissan Armada is a by-product of the ideology to provide maximum space to passengers while upholding comfort.
While the top-of-the-line trim of the Nissan Armada does feel heavily equipped, it is highly-priced. Thus, the mid-level variant, the SL, is the best bet in the segment and delivers the highest price to performance ratio in the segment. It features standard specifications of the base variant and can also add as optional specifications available with the Platinum trim.
Platinum 4dr SUV 4WD (5.6L 8cyl 5A)
Platinum 4dr SUV 4WD (5.6L 8cyl 5A)
Platinum 4dr SUV 4WD (5.6L 8cyl 5A)
Platinum 4dr SUV (5.6L 8cyl 5A)
Platinum 4dr SUV 4WD (5.6L 8cyl 5A)
Platinum 4dr SUV 4WD (5.6L 8cyl 5A)
Boxy SUVs have become a larger trend and garnered abundant attention, for they have higher space on the inside and score highly on the practicality front.
Boxy SUVs have become a larger trend and garnered abundant attention, for they have higher space on the inside and score highly on the practicality front. The Nissan Armada is a by-product of the ideology to provide maximum space to passengers while upholding comfort.
The Nissan Armada is available in three different trims, each of which features a common engine and transmission setup with two drivetrain options. It falls in a price range that extends from $28,650 for its base variant to $41,150 for the top-of-the-line trim. As standard, the Pathfinder comes equipped with features like power steering, power windows, and heated mirrors.
Trim |
SV |
SL |
Platinum |
---|---|---|---|
MSRP (Rear-wheel-drive) |
$36,890 |
$42,180 |
$49,460 |
MSRP (Four-wheel-drive) |
$42,390 |
$45,080 |
$52,360 |
Key Features |
Leather Wrapped Steering Wheel |
Adds or replaces features of SV |
Adds or replaces features of SL |
|
Remote Trunk Release |
Premium Sound System |
Hard Disk Drive |
|
Rear Parking Aid |
Rearview Camera |
Sun/Moonroof |
|
Cruise Control |
Fog Lamps |
Heated Steering Wheel |
|
Rear Seat Audio Controls |
Power Liftgate |
Integrated Turn Signal Mirrors |
|
Cloth Seats |
Leather Seats |
Entertainment System |
|
Keyless Entry |
Keyless Start |
Mirror Memory |
We Recommend
While the top-of-the-line trim of the Nissan Armada does feel heavily equipped, it is highly-priced. Thus, the mid-level variant, the SL, is the best bet in the segment and delivers the highest price to performance ratio in the segment. It features standard specifications of the base variant and can also add as optional specifications available with the Platinum trim.
The Nissan Armada features a single-engine option with no upgrades. It comes equipped with a 5.6L V8 engine that is good for 317 horses of power and 385lb.-ft of torque.
It comes mated to a 5-speed automatic transmission with tow/haul mode and transfers power either to the rear or all four wheels of the SUV depending on the trim you opt for. Considering its size and structure, the Nissan Armada feels quick and can complete a 60MPH run and a quarter-mile sprint in 7.8 and 16 seconds respectively. It records a top speed of 117 MPH.
Model |
Nissan Armada |
Toyota Sequoia |
Ford Expedition |
---|---|---|---|
MSRP |
$52,360 |
$55,165 |
$51,355 |
Engine |
5.6L V8 |
5.7L V8 |
5.4L V8 |
Drivetrain |
Four-wheel-drive |
Four-wheel-drive |
Four-wheel-drive |
Transmission |
5-speed automatic |
6-speed automatic |
6-speed automatic |
Power |
317hp |
381hp |
310hp |
Torque |
385lb.-ft |
401lb.-ft |
365lb.-ft |
0-60 MPH (seconds) |
7.8 seconds |
6.7 seconds |
7.8 seconds |
Quarter-mile (mph) |
16 seconds |
N/A |
16.1 seconds |
Top speed (mph) |
117 MPH |
N/A |
134 MPH |
While the Ford Expedition also records similar timings as the Nissan Armada in both the tests, they are not the quickest in the segment. The Toyota Sequoia by putting its higher power and torque outputs at use clocks the acceleration test in 6.7 seconds. All three SUVs make use of a V8 engine setup and are channeled as four-wheel-drive variants. The Sequoia and Expedition make use of 6-speed automatic transmission.
The Nissan Armada does score lowly on the efficiency front, which implies a higher cost of running. It manages to average mileage of 12 MPG in the city and 18 MPG on the highway. Combined, it is rated at 14 miles per gallon of fuel. Its fuel tank has a total capacity of 28-gallons, which is the largest in the segment. It covers a total distance of 336 and 504 miles respectively in the city and on the highway.
Model |
Nissan Armada |
Toyota Sequoia |
Ford Expedition |
---|---|---|---|
MPG (city) |
12 |
13 |
13 |
MPG (Highway) |
18 |
17 |
18 |
MPG (Combined) |
14 |
14 |
15 |
Fuel Capacity |
28 gallons |
26.4 gallons |
25 gallons |
Range (City/highway) |
336/504 mi |
343.2/448.8 mi |
364/504 mi |
In comparison, the Ford Expedition is the most fuel-efficient SUV; however, is just notch above its contemporaries managing 15 MPG. The Toyota Sequoia manages similar efficiency as the Armada. In terms of fuel tank capacity, both competitors feature a rather less voluminous tank but manage competitive range.
The cabin of the Nissan Armada is not particularly impressive. The overall design looks old-fangled and the use of substandard quality materials deteriorates the aura inside the SUV. The old-school design extends to the central console, the gauge cluster, and also the dashboard; however, what does come as a relief is the ample storage space on offer and the provision of rear-seat audio controls.
The seats of the Nissan Armada are comfortable and provide an adjuring view of the road outside. For all eight passengers, the space on offer is ample. Both upholstery options available work well in tandem with the cabin layout. The ride quality does, however, falter at occasions more than one. Even on rough terrains, the Armada isn’t comfortable. The detached handling of the SUV causes a more synthetic feel. The cargo capacity on offer is the lowest in the segment.
Model |
Nissan Armada |
Toyota Sequoia |
Ford Expedition |
---|---|---|---|
Seating Capacity |
8 |
8 |
8 |
Front Row (Head/Shoulder/Leg) (in) |
39.7/65/41.8 |
38.3/66.4/42.5 |
39.6/63.2/41.1 |
Second Row (Head/Shoulder/Leg) (in) |
40/64.7/41.9 |
38.9/66.1/36.5 |
39.8/63.7/39.1 |
Third Row (Head/Shoulder/Leg) (in) |
35.9/63.7/32.2 |
36/66/35.3 |
38.3/51.9/37.7 |
Cargo Capacity to 3rd seat (cu.-ft) |
20 |
18.9 |
18.6 |
Cargo Capacity to 2nd seat (cu.-ft) |
56.7 |
66.6 |
55 |
Cargo Capacity to 1st seat (cu.-ft) |
97.1 |
120.1 |
108.3 |
As standard, all three SUVs in the segment have a seating capacity of eight passengers. While the front-row occupants have maximum space in the Toyota Sequoia, the middle and rear-row occupants will find themselves at ease in the Ford Expedition. Despite higher third-row space, both contemporaries of the Nissan Armada manage higher cargo volumes.
Some salient interior features include:
Even from the base variant, the Nissan Armada’s infotainment system feels heavily equipped. Its intuitiveness and innate usage also contribute to its likability. As standard, the Armada comes equipped with Bluetooth connectivity, AM/FM stereo, and an eight-speaker sound system. With the SV and Platinum trims, an 11-speaker Bose Sound system is also available to the buyer. The hard-disk drive and entertainment system are available with the top-rack trim. Some other features include:
The Nissan Armada is based on the Titan Truck is evident in its design. The headlights and the front grille bear an uncanny resemblance, while the taillights do look refreshing and subtle. In its stance, the Armada is beefy, brawny, and boxy. The roof rails and a side stepper reassure the buyer of the Suv’s mammoth proportions. The use of bold chrome embellishments does add to the plushness.
The Nissan Armada weighs 5841 lbs and is the lightest SUV in the segment. It is 207.7 inches long and sports a wheelbase of 123.2 inches, making it the longest SUV. It is 79.3 inches wide with a height of 78 inches and a ground clearance of 10.4 inches.
Model |
Nissan Armada |
Toyota Sequoia |
Ford Expedition |
---|---|---|---|
Curb Weight (lbs) |
5841 |
5985 |
5781 |
Length (in.) |
207.7 |
205.1 |
206.5 |
Width (in.) |
79.3 |
79.9 |
78.8 |
Height (in.) |
78 |
77 |
77.2 |
Ground Clearance (in.) |
10.4 |
10 |
8.7 |
Wheelbase (in.) |
123.2 |
122 |
119 |
In comparison, the Toyota Sequoia and Ford Expedition are relatively heavy and weigh 5985 and 5781 lbs respectively. The Toyota Sequoia is the widest car in the segment measuring 79.9 inches, while the Ford Expedition sports the shortest wheelbase and lowest ground clearance of 119 and 8.7 inches respectively. Some standout exterior features of the Nissan Armada include:
The Nissan Armada has not been rated in major aspects by the NHTSA or the IIHS, but its long list of active and passive safety features speaks volumes about its dependability and reliability. As standard, the Nissan Armada makes use of 4-wheel disc brakes and is equipped with driver and passenger airbags. Basic safety specifications include traction control, brake assist, and electronic stability control. Other advanced and hi-tech features include:
The Nissan Armada as an SUV variant of the Titan truck fails to impress the traditional buyer in the segment. Not only does its engine deliver slower performance than the segment leaders, but its fuel efficiency is also annoying. The cabin build feels inferior and fusty, with the use of cheap quality material. Though its infotainment and safety systems are impressive, the Armada’s uncoordinated ride and disengaged handling quality cause the SUV to be blemished and blotched. With a large number of factors working antithetical to its cause, we suggest looking elsewhere in the segment before finalizing the purchase decision.