For 2017, Chevrolet offers Equinox with a standard engine with a 2.4-liter four-cylinder that churns out 182 hp and 172 pound-feet of torque, a little underpowered for its weight. The optional 3.6-liter V6 (301 hp, 272 lb-ft) is much better. Both engines come standard with a six-speed automatic transmission and front-wheel drive. All-wheel drive is discretionary aside from on the base L trim.
|
Models
|
Chevrolet Equinox L
|
Ford Escape S
|
Volkswagen Tiguan S
|
Mazda CX-5 sport
|
|
MSRP
|
$23,100
|
$23,750
|
$24,995
|
$24,045
|
|
Engine
|
2.4L 4cyl
|
2.5L i-VCT
|
2.0L TSI DOHC Turbocharged 4-Cylinder
|
2.5L DOHC 16-Valve 4-Cylinder
|
|
Transmission
|
6-speed automatic
|
6-speed automatic
|
6-speed automatic
|
6-speed automatic
|
|
Horsepower
|
182 hp
|
168 hp
|
200 hp
|
187 hp
|
|
Torque
|
172lb.-ft
|
170 lb-ft
|
207 lb-ft
|
185 lb-ft
|
| Drivetrain |
FWD |
FWD |
FWD |
FWD |
In terms of the competition, each competitive SUV makes use of a four-cylinder engine. While the 2017 Equinox's base engine feels sluggish, the Ford Escape has the lowest power and torque output of 168hp and 170lb.ft respectively. The turbocharged unit of Volkswagen Tiguan is the most powerful amongst the pack and is good for 200hp and 207lb.-ft of torque. Each SUV in the market makes use of a 6-speed automatic transmission and transfer power to the front wheels as standard.
2017 Chevrolet Equinox Acceleration Performance
The sluggish and slow-moving nature of the Chevrolet Equinox is evident in the way it performs. A base engine equipped Equinox can move from 0-60mph in 9.3 seconds, which is the slowest in the segment. Even in the quarter-mile run it lurks at the bottom of the table clocking 17 seconds. If you're looking for a better performer, the V6 engine has better acceleration timings and manages to sprint from a still to the 60mph mark in flat 7 seconds.
|
Models
|
Chevrolet Equinox L
|
Ford Escape S
|
Volkswagen Tiguan S
|
Mazda CX-5 sport
|
|
0-60 MPH
|
9.3 sec
|
9.1 sec
|
8.3 sec
|
8.9 sec
|
|
Quarter mile
|
17.0 sec
|
16.8 sec
|
17.0 sec
|
16.6 sec
|
|
Engine
|
2.4L
|
2.5L
|
2.0L
|
2.5L
|
In comparison, the 2017 Volkswagen Tiguan is the quickest to the 60mph mark recording 8.3 seconds, however, it falls to the bottom of the table when testing the quarter-mile timings. On the other hand, the Mazda CX-5 maintains consistency in its performance throughout clocking 8.9 and 16.6 seconds respectively. On the other hand, the Ford Escape remains only diminutively ahead of the 2017 Equinox.
How well does the Chevrolet Equinox Ride and Handle?
Equinox's handling abilities are not all that much. The steering feels numb and to some degree lose, while at the same time the suspension is tuned to support comfort over physicality. The upside is a smooth ride that is supplemented by the quietness of the lodge at speed. There's not much "amusing-to-drive" here, but rather the 2017 Equinox's everyday driver certifications are really strong.
However, the Equinox offers up a serenely casual ride around town or on the expressway, even though the standard 4-cylinder engine is excessively loud at full throttle. In any case, consider the possibility that it's terrible to drive. The compact SUV showcase isn't precisely overflowing with models that long for a twisty byway - Mazda CX-5 despite - so the Equinox's calm solace is a preference, or if nothing else, not all that bad. However, there's no concealing that Equinox is getting old contrasted with its rivals, and is expected for a refresh.
2017 Chevrolet Equinox Braking Performance
When it comes time to stop, Equinox's brakes are smooth and predictable. The car feels in control and the power of brakes can be felt when the foot is on the paddle. Chevrolet Equinox L is equipped with quite large brake pads that perform appreciably well because it is the heaviest SUV in the competition.
|
Model
|
Chevrolet Equinox L
|
Ford Escape S
|
Volkswagen Tiguan S
|
Mazda CX-5 sport
|
|
Brake Front (in.)
|
12.6
|
12.8
|
12.3
|
11.7
|
|
Brake Rear (in.)
|
11.9
|
12.0
|
11.1
|
11.9
|
|
Curb Weight (lbs.)
|
3764
|
3515
|
3448
|
3527
|
|
60-0 MPH (ft.)
|
116
|
112
|
N/A
|
126
|
With its front and rear brake pads measuring 12.6 and 11.9 inches respectively, this 'heavy' SUV covers 116 feet before coming to halt from a speed of 60 mph whereas; Ford Escape S takes just 112 feet to do the same and is probably the best in class.
